CLN4U Assessment and Evaluation

 

 

Assessment OF Learning

No.
Summative Assessment
Value
Date
-- Ongoing Triangulation Index 5 Daily observations
1 Mastery Learning Lab 10 Daily (See my note about the Mastery Learning Lab)
2 Field Study Presentation 5 October 14th (Due in Google Classroom)
3 Unit Test 1: The History & Nature of Law 6 November 11th
4 Scholarly Journal Submission 8

January 12th (Due in Turnitin & Google Classroom)

5 Unit Test 2: Criminal Adjudication 8 February 27th, March 1st, or March 3rd (Personalized Learn Date) (People involved in the play can choose to write on Tuesday, March 7th. These people must get clearance ahead of time.)
6 Mock Trial 8

February 13th:

Trial #1(Section-II): 8:45 AM - 10:00 AM
Trial #2A (Section I): 10:05 - 11:25 AM

February 15th:

Trial #2B (Section I): 10:05 AM - 11:25 AM

7 International Law Position-Paper 10 April 10th (Done in class across two days, then submitted in Turnitin, and then peer-reviewed the next class.)
8 Unit Test 3: Human Rights and Freedoms 10 May 17th
9 Self-Directed Civic Engagement Project 5-15 Ongoing. Can be amended up to May 31st
10 Final Exam 15-25 June (TBA)

Rule of Ten

HTS Social Science Retest Policy

The purpose of re-testing is to improve student learning and mastery of the subject matter and to ensure that there are no significant gaps in the competencies being developed in each subject area.

  • NOTE: Students in this course must schedule a test rewrite using Mr. Lightstone's Online Test Rewrite Scheduler.

  •  

    Assessment for Learning

    Formative Assessment
    Target Date
    Field Study Proposal / Ethical Review  
    Field Study Presentation September 23
    The Nature of Law (Mastery Content Quiz) Ongoing 
    Our Legal Heritage (Mastery Content Quiz) Ongoing 
    Mandatory English Proficiency Test November 17 / 18
    Criminal Law (Mastery Content Quiz) Ongoing 
    ISP - Thesis Proposal (Student Swap) Jan. 17 / 18
    ISP - Structured Annotated Bibliography Feb. 13 / 14
    Forms of Evidence and Defence (Mastery Content Quiz) Ongoing
    Statements and Confessions (Mastery Content Quiz) Ongoing
    Criminology and Corrections (Mastery Content Quiz) Ongoing
    Human Rights and Freedoms (Mastery Content Quiz) Ongoing

     

    Three Styles of Assessment

    Assessment Styles

    Assessment FOR Learning:

    Assessment that is intended to provide students the opportunity to apply their learning. This assessment is formative in nature: providing both the student and the teacher with insight into the learning that is taking place. This assessment does not generally count toward the student's grade, but it can be counted for a limited amount if it is associated with an Observations of Student Learning Index.

    Goal(s): To allow students to practice skills and apply knowledge, and to guide the next steps for intstruction and learning.

    Examples: formative quizzes, exercises, and presentations.


    Assessment AS Learning:

    Assessment that is intended to provide students the opportunity to reflect upon their learning. This assessment is formative in nature: providing both the student and the teacher with insight into the student's own reflection upon his/her learning. This style of assessment does not generally count toward the student's grade; however, reflective exercises can be counted if they are made to be part of a summative assignment.

    Goal(s): To develop student metacognition. In other words, to give students insight into their own thinking and learning and to help students develop and refine strategies to use in future learning.

    Examples: reflective journals, exit cards.


    Assessment OF Learning:

    Assessment that is intended to depict a student's level of achievment at a given point in time. This assessment is summative in nature, and thus will count toward the student's grade.

    Goal(s): To provide the student with a mark that will inform the student and other interested parties of the student's relative achievment with respect to the course curriculum.

    Examples: summative quizzes, tests, essays, reports, labs, and presentations.




    The Mastery Learning Lab

     

    The quizzes in the Mastery Learning Lab are "mastery learning" quizzes, which means that you are invited to take these quizzes repeatedly until you master them. The highest mark on any given quiz will be the one that is counted.

    The quizzes in the Lab are technically considered "formative" during a unit because they are mastery quizzes that you can take over and over again during the unit to help you develop your understanding of the topic. Moreover, they will help both you and me identify areas of strength and weakness in your understanding of a topic as we move through the unit. However, at the conclusion of the unit these quizzes become "summative" because their final marks will indeed be counted toward your final grade as of the conclusion of any given unit. (Quizzes left undone will be counted as a zero.)

    Of course, it goes without saying that mastering the material on these quizzes will invariably help you immensely when it comes time to write the unit tests in this course.

     

     

    OUAC Mark Submissions

     

    OUAC mark submissions always bring with them a great deal of anxiety, consternation, and even desperation. I dare say, at times people get a little carried away with the idea of early admissions to the university of their dreams and the program of their aspirations. Before this period of high emotion comes upon us, I thought I should clear up a few things about OUAC mark submissions in my courses.

    i) Highest Mark Illusion: As human beings, we are all subject to a plethora of overconfidence effects and biases, not the least of which is known as the positive illusion: where people cling to evidence of superiority while diminishing the relevance or importance of evidence to the contrary. In the big picture, there are many healthy things about these biases, so, please, I encourage you all to think well of yourselves and to be optimistic about your potential. Such optimism really does expand the opportunities we have in life. Having said that, I thought I should point out how this basic predisposition impacts a student's perception of their grades. Basically, students will tend to overemphasize the validity of their highest grades, and diminish the validity of their lower grades. As a result, students will tend to think of their highest grade in a course as being their only legitimate grade, and anything lower as being some sort of aberration. In reality, marks - all marks - fluctuate, and they only represent a student's relative achievement as of a given point in time. I would respectfully ask that my students refrain from asking me to adjust their OUAC mark back to their highest point of attainment up to a given point in the course.

    This brings us to the next issue I want to address: Just what does the Ontario Universities Application Centre want us to tell them?

    ii) The Myth of Predicted or Estimated Grades: For years, rumours have persisted that OUAC marks are supposed represent some sort of estimated or predicted final grade, thus providing license to teachers to ignore a student's current grade in preference for some other grade. To get to the bottom of this perception, I called the Ontario Universities Application Centre back in February of 2011, and I spoke with the personnel in their guidance department. They clarified that the marks provided to OUAC in mid-February are supposed to be the actual marks that students have, either at the end of a first semester course, or as at that point in time (i.e. in mid-February) for a full-year course. The mark is not supposed to represent a teacher’s “anticipated” final mark for a student, nor is the teacher supposed to exercise any discretion over the marks in order to influence the students’ opportunities or chances of acceptance.

    This brings me to my final point: What am I willing to do in order to exercise discretion over my OUAC marks?

    iii) Dropping Lowest Marks: While I fully acknowledge that some teachers have a policy of dropping lowest marks within a given mark category (ex. dropping a lowest test in the test category), I'm afraid I cannot implement such a policy in my courses. Given that my courses all subscribe to the Rule of TEN, I don't have many tests to drop by the end of January. In fact, I usually only have two! Thus, when students ask me to drop their lowest test, they are actually asking me to drop half of all the tests they have written. Obviously, I can't do that. Moreover, I would point out that my Mastery Learning Lab, which is weighted at ten percent of my course evaluation, is set to only count the highest mark on any given quiz. Thus, nothing but the highest marks are counted in that particular mark category. As is my custom, I will not do for one student what I will not do for all of my students, so this is a policy that I have put in place for all of my students, and it tends to provide the benefit of doubt in a systematic and transparent way.

    I wish you all the very best of luck in your OUAC mark submissions and in your university applications.

     


    Return to main index